|
|
Is the simplest procedure quite well for consensus?Procedure of reception of the coordinated result of various systems, used in BCS and Kenneth Massey in his compilation is simple and it seems natural. However its detailed consideration results in some logic contradictions. About it has very in detail written in the the remarkable analysis. Let's look at this procedure about some other point of view. The matter is that calculation of average ranks is that other as calculation of "defeats" of teams if to imagine a matrix in which all higher is appropriated a victory above all subordinate
L W The rank of a team is that other as number of defeats plus 1, that from the point of view of calculation of an average rating of nothing changes. Matrix representation of ranking however opens a way to more adequate definition of the coordinated representation of different computer ranking. For this purpose it is logical to use any of systems of calculation of ratings. Well it is valid, if using ratings we leave from a simple rating - calculation of victories (calculation of glasses a 2-victory, 1-drawn game 0 - defeat). That is strange, that at summarizing various computer programs we use the most elementary rating. It all the same what to use a computer as a table on which with the help of the calculator to make calculator Naturally I used e-rating to make consensus from Kenneth Massey's compilation. September 2004 E-Rnk Team E-Cons Massey's Diff 1 USC 4249 1 0 2 Oklahoma 1858 2 0 3 Miami FL 1147 3 0 4 Texas 916 4 0 5 LSU 374 5 0 6 Georgia 294 6 0 7 Michigan 275 7 0 8 Ohio St 247 8 0 9 Purdue 232 10 -1 10 Tennessee 201 12 -2 11 Boise St 198 9 2 12 Florida St 185 11 1 13 Iowa 179 14 -1 14 Utah 168 13 1 15 Virginia 133 16 -1 16 California 126 15 1 17 Maryland 88 18 -1 18 Auburn 78 17 1 19 Fresno St 63 19 0 20 Florida 55 20 0 21 Minnesota 53 21 0 22 NC State 53 22 0 23 Oklahoma St 53 23 0 24 Virginia Tech 51 26 -2 25 Arkansas 39 28 -3 26 Kansas St 35 25 1 27 West Virgin 35 24 3 28 Wisconsin 30 27 1 29 Alabama 22 30 -1 30 Louisville 21 31 -1 31 Colorado 26 40 -9 32 Clemson 18 29 3 33 Nebraska 16 32 1 34 Washington St 14 33 1 35 Georgia Tech 12 34 1 36 TCU 12 37 -1 37 Oregon St 11 38 -1 38 Memphis 11 39 -1 39 Boston College 9 35 4 40 Southern Miss 10 36 4 41 Bowling Green 8 41 0 42 Pittsburgh 7 42 0 43 Arizona St 9 43 0 44 Texas Tech 5 44 0 45 Miami OH 5 47 -2 46 South Carolina 3 46 0 47 Notre Dame 5 45 2 48 Oregon 3 48 0 49 Missouri 4 51 -2 50 N Illinois 3 49 1 51 Stanford 2 50 1 52 Mississippi 2 52 0 53 Troy St 2 55 -2 54 Wake Forest 2 59 -5 55 Kansas 2 54 1 56 Penn St 1 57 -1 57 New Mexico 2 53 4 58 Connecticut 2 56 2 59 UAB 1 65 -6 60 Colorado St 2 60 0 61 Navy 1 66 -5 62 Texas A&M 1 63 -1 63 UCLA 3 58 5 64 Michigan St 1 61 3 65 Cincinnati 1 64 1 66 Brigham Young 1 67 -1 67 Marshall 1 62 5 68 San Diego St 1 69 -1 69 Indiana 1 73 -4 70 Washington 2 68 2 71 Hawaii 1 72 -1 72 South Florida 1 70 2 73 Northwestern 1 71 2 74 UNLV 1 77 -3 75 Syracuse 1 75 0 76 Rutgers 1 76 0 77 Rice 1 78 -1 78 Louisiana Tech 1 74 4 79 Toledo 0 79 0 80 Air Force 0 80 0 81 Iowa St 0 81 0 82 North Texas 0 82 0 83 Mississippi St 0 85 -2 84 Arizona 1 83 1 85 Wyoming 0 84 1 86 North Carolina 0 86 0 87 Middle Tenn St 0 88 -1 88 Tulsa 1 87 1 89 Houston 0 89 0 90 Kentucky 0 90 0 91 Nevada 0 91 0 92 W Michigan 0 92 0 93 Illinois 0 93 0 94 Kent 0 94 0 95 Duke 0 95 0 96 Tulane 0 96 0 97 Vanderbilt 0 97 0 98 Ball St 0 98 0 99 Utah St 0 100 -1 100 LA Lafayette 0 99 1 101 Akron 0 101 0 102 Temple 0 102 0 103 New Mexico St 0 103 0 104 UCF 0 105 -1 105 Ohio 0 104 1 106 San Jose St 0 106 0 107 Baylor 0 108 -1 108 E Michigan 0 107 1 109 Texas-El Paso 0 109 0 110 East Caroli 0 110 0 111 Idaho 0 111 0 112 Arkansas St 0 112 0 113 LA Monroe 0 113 0 114 C Michigan 0 114 0 115 SMU 0 115 0 116 Buffalo 0 116 0 117 Army 0 117 0 |
|
|
|